C2C ROSTERING METHODS

By offering Clever, ClassLink, One Roster, file imports, SIS and LMS integrations, API access, SSO capabilities, even manual entry, C2C ensures that educational publishers can meet the needs of all institutions and customers can choose the most suitable approach for their specific needs, technical capabilities, and existing infrastructure.

OUR ONBOARDING METHODS CATER TO A WIDE RANGE OF EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS

When selecting an onboarding method, consider:

  • the size of your institution

  • existing technical infrastructure

  • data management practices

  • the level of automation desired

Many schools may find that a combination of these methods works best, using automated systems for bulk data management while retaining the ability to make manual adjustments as needed.

Ultimately, C2C's flexible approach to onboarding helps ensure that educators and students can quickly gain access to the platform's valuable resources, allowing them to focus on what matters most: teaching and learning.

Content2Classroom (C2C) offers a versatile range of methods for onboarding students, teachers, and class rosters. The table explores each method, discussing how C2C works with them and which scenarios they're best suited for.

  • SERVICE: C2C

    HOW IT WORKS:

    • Administrators manually input data

    • Create classes and assign users individually

    BEST SUITED FOR:

    • Small schools

    • Individual classrooms

    • Pilot programs

    • Homeschools or Direct-to-Consumer markets

    PROS:

    • High control over data entry

    • No technical setup

    • Ideal for small-scale use

    CONS:

    • Time-consuming for large numbers

    • Prone to human error

    • Difficult to maintain at scale

  • SERVICE: via One Roster or EdLink

    HOW IT WORKS:

    • Prepare spreadsheets with required fields

    • Upload to C2C

    • System maps columns and processes data

    BEST SUITED FOR:

    • Medium to large-scale deployments

    • Schools with existing spreadsheet data

    • Periodic bulk updates

    PROS:

    • Efficient for adding many users

    • Allows offline data preparation

    • Familiar format for most admins

    CONS:

    • Requires careful data preparation

    • Needs regular updates

    • Limited real-time sync

  • SERVICE: via Clever, Classlink, or Edlink

    HOW IT WORKS:

    • C2C integrates with SIS platforms

    • Automatic syncing of user and class data

    • Changes in SIS reflect in C2C

    BEST SUITED FOR:

    • Large schools/districts with established SIS

    • Need for data consistency

    • Minimal manual management

    PROS:

    • Automatic, real-time sync

    • Reduces manual work and errors

    • Ensures data consistency

    CONS:

    • Requires initial setup

    • Dependent on SIS reliability

    • May be overkill for small schools

  • SERVICE: C2C

    HOW IT WORKS:

    • C2C provides APIs for data management

    • Custom integrations can be developed

    • Allows automated, real-time updates

    BEST SUITED FOR:

    • Schools with custom systems

    • Specific integration needs

    • Tech-savvy environments

    PROS:

    • Highly flexible and customizable

    • Enables real-time updates

    • Wide integration possibilities

    CONS:

    • Requires technical expertise

    • Higher initial setup costs

    • Needs ongoing maintenance

  • SERVICE: via Clever, Classlink, Edlink, or Google Classroom

    HOW IT WORKS:

    • Integrates with SSO solutions

    • Users log in with existing credentials

    • Can automate account provisioning

    BEST SUITED FOR:

    • Schools using Google Workspace or Microsoft 365

    • Focus on user experience and security

    • Simplifying account management

    PROS:

    • Simplifies login process

    • Can automate provisioning

    • Enhances security

    CONS:

    • Requires existing SSO infrastructure

    • May limit C2C user management

    • Dependent on SSO provider

  • SERVICE: LTI (C2C supports LTI standards including LTI 1.3 and LTI Advantage) or SSO (via Clever, Classlink, Edlink, Google Classroom)

    HOW IT WORKS:

    • Integrates with LMS platforms

    • Syncs users and classes between LMS and C2C

    • Often includes SSO capabilities

    BEST SUITED FOR:

    • Schools invested in an LMS

    • Need for seamless LMS-C2C experience

    • Leveraging existing LMS data

    PROS:

    • Uses existing LMS data

    • Familiar user environment

    • Simplifies content sharing

    CONS:

    • Dependent on LMS data quality

    • May increase system complexity

    • Could limit some C2C features

  • SERVICE: C2C

    HOW IT WORKS:

    • Administrators generate unique access codes

    • Users sign up using the provided code

    • System automatically assigns users to correct classes/groups

    BEST SUITED FOR:

    • Schools with limited IT infrastructure

    • Quick deployment scenarios

    • Situations requiring user self-registration

    • Homeschool or Direct-to-Consumer Scenarios

    PROS:

    • Easy to distribute and use

    • Reduces administrative overhead

    • Allows for controlled, self-service onboarding

    CONS:

    • Potential for code sharing or misuse

    • Limited granular control over user data

    • May require additional verification steps

WANT TO SEE MORE?